Personality Traits as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior: Evidence from the Philippines

https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v9i1.68

Authors

Keywords:

personality traits, HEXACO model, pro-environment behavior, conservation psychology, multiple regression

Abstract

One of the objectives within the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development set by the United Nations General Assembly is to enhance global awareness about sustainable development by disseminating precise information to people worldwide and encouraging lifestyles that harmonize with nature. Pope Francis's Laudato Si' is considered by many as a landmark document urging major change because it criticizes the consumer-centered way of life and argues that protecting the Earth requires a complete shift in our priorities. It is believed that pro-environmental behaviors play an important role in achieving the goals of the SDGs, UNESCO, and Laudato Si'. Previous studies have shown relationships between pro-environmental behavior and personality traits. However, these studies were conducted in foreign contexts, and to the best of the researcher's knowledge, there was no published local study that explains the connection between personality traits and pro-environmental behavior among Filipinos, particularly those in the workforce. This is the gap that this study aimed to address. This study determined the link between personality traits and pro-environmental behavior of Filipino workers in the National Capital Region (NCR). This utilized a cross-sectional predictive design. The participants were comprised of 644 Filipino workers from the NCR. In terms of gender, there were 256 (39.8%) males, 374 (58.1%) females, and 14 (2.2%) undisclosed. Two sets of self-report questionnaires were administered online: the Brief HEXACO Inventory and the adapted General Ecological Behavior Scale. Results of the main analysis suggest that only Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience as personality traits positively predict pro-environmental behavior; while Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, and Agreeableness did not. This may suggest that individuals who score high on these personality dimensions are more likely to engage in behaviors that benefit the environment. Therefore, strategic interventions aimed at developing these qualities could potentially contribute to a significant shift towards sustainability among Filipino workers.

References

Ashton, M. C. (2018). Individual differences and personality. 3rd ed. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809845-5.00008-1

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907

Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2020). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure—and why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, 34(4), 492– 510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202

Bradley, G. L., Babutsidze, Z., Chai, A., & Reser, J. P. (2020). The role of climate change risk perception, response efficacy, and psychological adaptation in pro-environmental behavior: A two-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101410

Corral-Verdugo, V., Aguilar-Luzón, M. D. C., & Hernández, B. (2019). Theoretical bases guiding conservation psychology. Papeles del Psicólogo—Psychologist Papers, 40(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2897

Clayton, S., & Brook, A. (2005). Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00057.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00057.x

Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. John Wiley & Sons.

Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 29(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001

dela Peña, P. N., Macale, A. M., & Largo, N. N. (2018). Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviors of high school students in Los Baños, Laguna. Journal of Nature Studies, 17(1), 56-67.

de Vera, P. J. D., Alombro, N. C., Patadon, S. M., & Catipay, J. P. A. (2023) Factors affecting the intention to implement pro-environmental behaviors: A case of riverside communities in Cotabato City rivers, Mindanao Island, Philippines. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 12(3), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2023.12.3.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2023.12.3.10

De Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item brief HEXACO inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 871-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004

DeYoung, C. G., & Tiberius, V. (2023). Value fulfillment from a cybernetic perspective: A new psychological theory of well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221083777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221083777

DeYoung, C. G., & Weisberg, Y. J. (2018). Cybernetic approaches to personality and social behavior. Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology, 387-414. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.25

Doni, F., Gasperini, A., & Soares, J. T. (2020). What is the SDG 13? SDG13 – Climate action: Combating climate change and its impacts, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-915-720201006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-915-720201006

Edmonds, G. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., & Roberts, B. W. (2008). Is character fate, or is there hope to change my personality yet?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00037.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00037.x

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publication Ltd.

Fitriana, D. E. N., Miyarsah, M., & Rusdi, R. (2019). The analysis of pro environmental behavior (PEB) through by personality at senior high school students. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 3(1), 48-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v3i1.1116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v3i1.1116

Fuller Jr, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008

Gatersleben, B. (2013). Measuring environmental behaviour. In Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., & de Groot, J. I. M. (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: An introduction. BPS Blackwell.

Gatersleben, B. & Murtagh, N. (2023). Handbook on Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800882133.00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800882133

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765

Gumasing, M. J. J., Bayola, A., Bugayong, S. L., & Cantona, K. R. (2023). Determining the factors affecting Filipinos’ acceptance of the use of renewable energies: A pro-environmental planned behavior model. Sustainability, 15(9), 7702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097702

Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Sustainable Consumer Behaviour and the Environment, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003256274-1

Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2017). The mindful personality: A meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective. Mindfulness, 8, 1456-1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0736-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0736-8

Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003

Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 245-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004

Hirsh, J. B. (2014). Environmental sustainability and national personality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.005

Jacobson, S., Weis, B., & Schneider, A. B. (2017). Laudato Si’and the consumption challenge: Giving students a visceral exercise in saving our planet. Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal, 6(1). https://epublications.regis.edu/jhe/vol6/iss1/12

Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational researcher, 30(2), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches 5th ed. Sage Publications, Inc.

Joseph, O. (2020). Pro-environmental consumer behavior: A critical review of literature. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n1p DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n1p1

Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 28(5), 395-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x

Kaiser, F.G. (2020). GEB-50. General Ecological Behavior Scale [procedure documentation, questionnaire in German and English]. In Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) (ed.), Open Test Archive. Trier: ZPID. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4489

Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney, M. A. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing People's General Ecological Behavior: A Cross‐Cultural Measure 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(5), 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x

Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004

Kesenheimer, J. S., & Greitemeyer, T. (2021). Going green (and not being just more pro-social): do attitude and personality specifically influence pro-environmental behavior?. Sustainability, 13(6), 3560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063560

Klein, T. A., & Laczniak, G. R. (2021). Laudato si’–a macromarketing manifesto for a just and sustainable environment. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720968321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720968321

Krajhanzl, J. (2010). Environmental and proenvironmental behavior. School and health, 21(1), 251-274.

Kressel, L. M., & Uleman, J. S. (2010). Personality traits function as causal concepts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.018

Kvasova, O. (2015). The Big Five personality traits as antecedents of eco-friendly tourist behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.011

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate behavioral research, 39(2), 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

Markowitz, E. M., Goldberg, L. R., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2012). Profiling the “pro‐environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of personality, 80(1), 81-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x

Nieva, A. (2022). The Relationship between Career Interests and Academic Achievements in English, Mathematics, and Science of Grade 10 Students. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(2 June Issue). Retrieved from https://www.mail.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/122

Nieva , A. (2023). Construct validation of the teacher attitude to inclusion scale for Filipino pre-service teachers. Bedan Research Journal, 8(1), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v8i1.56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v8i1.56

Nieva , A., & Prudente, J. (2022). Online self-regulated learning, academic performance, and well-being of Senior High School Students in the NCR: A mediation analysis. Bedan Research Journal, 7(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v7i1.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v7i1.32

Palupi, T., & Sawitri, D. (2018). The importance of pro-environmental behavior in adolescent. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, Article No. 09031. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031

Pavalache-Ilie, M., & Cazan, A. M. (2018). Personality correlates of pro-environmental attitudes. International journal of environmental health research, 28(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1429576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1429576

Reyes, J. A. L. (2014). Environmental attitudes and behaviors in the Philippines. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 87. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p87

Selinske, M. J., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Gordon, A., Kusmanoff, A. M., & Fidler, F. (2018). Revisiting the promise of conservation psychology. Conservation Biology, 32(6), 1464-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13106

Simpao, A. C., & Yabut, H. (2022). Conservation Behavior Among Students in a University in Metro Manila: The Moderating Role of Attitudes on the Impact of Environmental Knowledge. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 22(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1466

Sijtsma, H., Lee, N. C., Buczny, J., Hollarek, M., Walsh, R. J., Van Buuren, M., & Krabbendam, L. (2023). HEXACO personality dimensions do not predict individual differences in adolescent trust behavior. Games, 14(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/g14010010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g14010010

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of research in personality, 43(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002

Soutter, A. R. B., & Mõttus, R. (2021). Big Five facets' associations with pro‐environmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Personality, 89(2), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12576

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.

Tezel, E., Ugural, M., & Giritli, H. (2018). Pro-environmental Behavior of University Students: Influence of Cultural Differences. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p43

VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000

Wallen, K. E., & Landon, A. C. (2020). Systematic map of conservation psychology. Conservation Biology, 34(6), 1339-1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13623

Wang, Q., Kou, Z., Sun, X., Wang, S., Wang, X., Jing, H., & Lin, P. (2022). Predictive analysis of the pro-environmental behaviour of college students using a Decision-Tree model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159407

Yu, T. Y., & Yu, T. K. (2017). The moderating effects of students’ personality traits on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in response to climate change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121472

Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723-760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036

Published

10/22/2024

How to Cite

Nieva , A. (2024). Personality Traits as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior: Evidence from the Philippines. Bedan Research Journal, 9(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v9i1.68

Issue

Section

Articles

cITATION